iOS 27

iPhone

iPad

Apple Watch

AirPods

Apple Deals

Apple Tried to Keep Its $634 Million Apple Watch Loss From Getting Even Worse, but a Judge Just Added Another $184 Million Anyway

Gotechtor select and review products independently. When you purchase through our links, we may earn a commission. See our ethics statement.

Apple’s $634 million Apple Watch patent loss has become considerably more expensive.

A federal judge has ordered Apple to pay Masimo another $184 million in prejudgment interest, bringing the judgment to about $818 million before additional interest continues to accrue until it is paid.

That extra $184 million adds nearly 29% to the original jury award.

Also: Your iCloud+ subscription just got a lot more valuable, with 1 surprising change that could replace a monthly email bill you never needed

Why Apple owes another $184 million

The additional money accounts for the years Masimo went without royalty payments the jury determined it should have received.

Apple argued that adding prejudgment interest would give Masimo a windfall. U.S. District Judge James Selna disagreed, finding that compensating Masimo for the time it was deprived of those royalties serves to make the company whole.

Masimo had sought even more. It asked the court to calculate interest at 7%, which would have added roughly $243 million.

Selna instead used Masimo’s borrowing rate and compounded the interest annually from when the infringement began.

Post-judgment interest is also accruing, meaning the amount can continue climbing while the judgment remains unpaid.

Also: Apple’s $1,999 iPhone Duo has a big problem it can’t fix by itself, and you could see the consequences the moment you open it

This won’t change your current Apple Watch

The underlying case concerns a Masimo pulse-oximetry patent and Apple Watch features including heart-rate notifications. A jury found in November 2025 that Apple infringed the patent and awarded Masimo $634 million in damages.

The patent expired in June 2022, so the case covers older Apple Watch sales rather than the watches Apple sells today. This ruling isn’t changing or removing current heart-rate features.

Apple’s fight with Masimo over blood oxygen is a separate patent dispute. That case produced the U.S. import restrictions that forced Apple to disable blood oxygen functionality on newly sold watches before introducing a redesigned version of the feature in 2025.

The two cases show how expensive the long-running dispute has become in different ways. One forced Apple to redesign a major Apple Watch health feature; the other has produced a judgment now worth more than $818 million, with Apple’s appellate options still available.

🍎 The only 5 Apple stories that matter — sent every Friday to 50K+ smart readers. You in?

Writer, Productivity & Phone Organization

Lise is a master of phone organization and a nerd of the internet! She writes a regular column for Gotechtor focusing on quick tips for decluttering and organizing your iPhone to be more productive, while still keeping it aesthetic.

Lise Dieuveuil

's latest stories

Leave a Comment

Be kind. Discriminatory language, personal attacks, promotion, and spam will be removed. Please read Gotechtor's Community Guidelines before participating.